PROPOSIÇÃO DE UM FRAMEWORK PARA A ANÁLISE DA INOVAÇÃO, ECONOMIA CIRCULAR, PERFORMANCE ORGANIZACIONAL E DESENVOLVIMENTO SUSTENTÁVEL
Resumo
A inovação é primordial para o desenvolvimento econômico de uma país, entretanto, a economia circular pode ser uma prática ambiental aliada para fomentar a performance organizacional e, consequentemente, o desenvolvimento sustentável, para não comprometer a qualidade de vida das gerações futuras. Neste contexto, a pesquisa tem como objetivo propor um Framework para a análise da inovação, economia circular, performance organizacional e o desenvolvimento sustentável das organizações. O método utilizado foi uma pesquisa qualitativa e exploratória, por meio de uma pesquisa sistemática na base de dados Scopus. Nos achados da pesquisa, contribuições gerenciais e avanços teóricos, o estudo apresentou um Framework que traz informações que podem ser utilizadas pelos gestores de diferentes segmentos de atuação e porte empresarial, que visam fomentar uma inovação que contribua para o desenvolvimento sustentável, fundamentais para a qualidade de vida das pessoas e a manutenção dos recursos naturais. O impacto da pesquisa para o avanço da ciência, proporciona à comunidade acadêmica e aos profissionais das áreas afins, uma melhor compreensão em torno da gestão da inovação e economia circular, assim como a sua contribuição para a performance das organizações e o desenvolvimento sustentável, os quais são primordiais para a manutenção do equilíbrio no planeta.
Downloads
Referências
ABU-RAYASH, A.; DINCER, I. Development of Integrated Sustainability Performance Indicators for Better Management of Smart Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 67, p. 102704, 2021.
ANDERSÉN, J. A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. Technovation, In Press, 2021.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2011.
BARNEY, J. B.; HESTERLY, W. S. Administração estratégica e vantagem competitiva: conceitos e casos. 3ed. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2011.
BERETTA, I. The social effects of eco-innovations in Italian smart cities. Cities, v. 72, p. 115-121, 2018.
BREM, A.; NYLUND, P. A.; SCHUSTER, G. Innovation and de facto standardization: The influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation, v. 50-51, p. 79-88, 2016.
BREM, A.; WIMSCHNEIDER, C.; DE AGUIAR DUTRA, A. R.; CUBAS, A. L. V.;
RIBEIRO, R. D. How to design and construct an innovative frugal product? An empirical examination of a frugal new product development process. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 275, p. 122232, 2020.
CHEN, J.; BURGELMAN, R. A.; LI, J.; HANG, C. C.; ZHENG, G. Leading for constructive innovation: Preliminary evidence from China. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 57, p. 101588, 2020.
COHEN, M. J. Does the COVID-19 outbreak mark the onset of a sustainable consumption transition? Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-3, 2020.
CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010.
DE ANGELIS, R. Circular economy and paradox theory: A business model perspective.
Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 285, p. 124823, 2021.
DEL BRÍO GONZÁLEZ, J.; BARBA-SÁNCHEZ, V. The Mediating effect of environmental proactivity on the influence of stakeholder pressure and environmental strategy of wineries in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research, v. 14, n. 6, p. 771-783, 2020.
DE SOUZA, W. J. V.; SCUR, G.; HILSDORF, W. de C. Eco-innovation practices in the brazilian ceramic tile industry: The case of the Santa Gertrudes and Criciúma clusters. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 199, p. 1007-1019, 2018.
FLICK, U. Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.
GARBI, E. Alternative measures of performance for e-companies: a comparison of approaches. Journal of Business Strategies, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2002.
GARCIA, R.; CALANTONE, R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 19, n. 2, p. 110-132, 2002.
GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ, E.; GARCÍA-MORALES, V. J.; MARTÍN-ROJAS, R. Analysis of the
influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 14, n. 2, p. 345-377, 2018a.
GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ, E.; GARCÍA-MORALES, V. J.; MARTÍN-ROJAS, R. Influence of technological assets on organizational performance through absorptive capacity, organizational innovation and internal labour flexibility. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 3, p. 770, 2018b.
GIBBS, G. Análise de dados qualitativos: coleção pesquisa qualitativa. Porto Alegre: Bookman Editora, 2009.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010. GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; SEVERO, E. A.; DORION, E. C. H.; COALLIER, F.; OLEA, P. M. The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: a survey of the Brazilian furniture industry. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 180, p. 135-147, 2016.
GILLESPIE‐MARTHALER, L.; NELSON, K.; BAROUD, H.; ABKOWITZ, M. Selecting
indicators for assessing community sustainable resilience. Risk Analysis, v. 39, p. 2479- 2498, 2019.
GRAFSTRÖM, J.; AASMA, S. Breaking circular economy barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 292, p. 126002, 2021.
GUPTA, H.; KUMAR, A.; WASAN, P. Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: an integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 295, p. 126253, 2021.
HANEDA, S.; ITO, K. Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? Research Policy, v. 47, n. 1, p. 194-208, 2018.
HILMAN, H.; ALI, G. A.; GORONDUTSE, A. H. The relationship between TQM and SMEs’ performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 69, n. 1, p. 61-84, 2019.
HULL, C. E.; MILLETTE, S.; WILLIAMS, E. Challenges and opportunities in building circular-economy incubators: Stakeholder perspectives in Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Cleaner Production, In press, p. 126412, 2021.
JABBOUR, C. J. C.; FIORINI, P. D. C.; WONG, C. W.; JUGEND, D.; JABBOUR, A. B. L.
D. S.; SELES, B. M. R. P.; PINHEIRO, M. A. P.; DA SILVA, H. M. R. (2020). First-mover
firms in the transition towards the sharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economy and emerging industry 4.0 technologies.
Resources Policy, v. 66, p. 101596, 2020.
KESKIN, D.; WEVER, R.; BREZET, H. Product innovation processes in sustainability- oriented ventures: A study of effectuation and causation. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 263, p. 121210, 2020.
KIRCHHERR, J.; REIKE, D.; HEKKERT, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 127, p. 221-232, 2017.
KORHONEN, J.; HONKASALO, A.; SEPPÄLÄ, J. Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, v. 143, p. 37-46, 2018.
LI, Y. P.; HUANG, G. H.; LI, H. Z.; LIU, J. Recourse‐based interval fuzzy programming
model for point‐nonpoint source effluent trading under uncertainty. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1191-1207, 2014.
LIU, C.; KONG, D. Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China.
Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 30, n. 1, p. 657-670, 2021.
MCDOWALL, W.; GENG, Y.; HUANG, B.; BARTEKOVÁ, E.; BLEISCHWITZ, R.;
TÜRKELI, S.; KEMP, R.; DOMÉNECH, T. Circular economy policies in China and Europe.
Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 21, n. 3, p. 651-661, 2017.
MIO, C.; PANFILO, S.; BLUNDO, B. Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29,
n. 8, p. 3220-3245, 2020.
NYLUND, P. A.; BREM, A.; AGARWAL, N. Innovation ecosystems for meeting sustainable development goals: The evolving roles of multinational enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 281, p. 125329, 2021.
OBRADOVIĆ, T.; VLAČIĆ, B.; DABIĆ, M. Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda. Technovation, p. 102221, 2021.
OECD. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo manual. 3 ed. OECD and Eurostat. Paris, 2005.
PALADINO, A. Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: a comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 24, n. 6, p. 534-553, 2007.
PIALOT, O.; MILLET, D. Towards operable criteria of eco-innovation and eco-ideation tools for the early design phases. Procedia CIRP, v. 69, p. 692-697, 2018.
PIERONI, M. P. P; MCALOONE, T. C.; PIGOSSO, D. C. A. From theory to practice: systematising and testing business model archetypes for circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 162, p. 105029, 2020.
PIERONI, M. P. P; MCALOONE, T. C.; PIGOSSO, D. C. A. Circular Economy business model innovation: sectorial patterns within manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 286, p. 124921, 2021.
SARKIS, J.; COHEN, M. J.; DEWICK, P.; SCHRÖDER, P. A brave new world: lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic for transitioning to sustainable supply and production. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, v. 159, p. 104894, 2020.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. The theory of economic development.1. ed. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1934.
SEVERO, E. A.; DE GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; DELLARMELIN, M. L. Impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility: Evidence from generations in Brazil and Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 286, p. 124947, 2021.
SEVERO, E. A.; DE GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; DORION, E. C. H. Cleaner production, social responsibility and eco-innovation: generations' perception for a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 186, p. 91-103, 2018.
SEVERO, E. A.; DE GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; DORION, E. C. H.; NODARI, C. H. Cleaner
production, environmental sustainability and organizational performance: an empirical study in the Brazilian Metal-Mechanic industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 96, p. 118-125, 2015.
SIEBENHÜNER, B.; ARNOLD, M. Organizational learning to manage sustainable development.
Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 16, n. 5, p. 339-353, 2007.
SIDDIQUE, S. P.; SCIULLI, N. Sustainable development of small companies: Investors' perspectives.
Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 27, n. 8, p. 1258-1271, 2018.
SLORACH, P. C.; JESWANI, H. K.; CUÉLLAR-FRANCA, R.; AZAPAGIC, A. Environmental
sustainability in the food-energy-water-health nexus: A new methodology and an application to food waste in a circular economy. Waste Management, v. 113, p. 359-368, 2020.
TOTIN, E.; VAN MIERLO, B.; KLERKX, L. Scaling practices within agricultural innovation platforms: Between pushing and pulling. Agricultural Systems, v. 179, p. 102764, 2020.
WINANS, K.; DLOTT, F.; HARRIS, E.; DLOTT, J. Sustainable value mapping and analysis methodology: enabling stakeholder participation to develop localized indicators mapped to broader sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 291, p. 125797, 2021.
XU, Y.; YEH, C. H.; YANG, S.; GUPTA, B. Risk-based performance evaluation of improvement strategies for sustainable e-waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 155, p. 104664, 2020.
YU, K.; QIAN, C.; ZHANG, L. Understanding sustainable development flexibility: An information perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, In press, 2021.
YUAN, Z.; BI, J.; MORIGUICHI, Y. The circular economy: A new development strategy in China.
Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1‐2), 4-8, 2006.
ZABALA-ITURRIAGAGOITIA, J. M.; APARICIO, J.; ORTIZ, L.; CARAYANNIS, E. G.;
GRIGOROUDIS, E. The productivity of national innovation systems in Europe: Catching up or falling behind? Technovation, In Press, p. 102215, 2020.
ZHAO, X.; SUN, B. The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 112, p. 1528-1536, 2016.
